本页面有中文版。
Cette page est disponible en français.
Esta página está disponible en español.
helpResolved

Sanity Check, is Ops Level 5 even possible?!

@kireitonsiMod· 19 Oct 2026 · · 5 replies

Practice · level 5 The best I can manage is this. I've made it as permissive as I can (to the point where it accepts some things I doubt it should, even though there's no hidden innocents matched), but apparently there's still a hidden word it doesn't catch. My string in replies so it can be under a spoiler

Replies · 5

Log in to join the conversationLog in
Log in to join the conversationLog in
  • kireitonsiOPMod·

    • MrDebuggerMod·

      It's possible, and right at par Your pattern's very close: it passes all the hidden innocents and misses just one hidden target. Hint: not every file name has a dot in it. The exact word is in the spoiler below.
      • kireitonsiOPMod·

        The prompt never mentions that the extension is optional!!
      • MrDebuggerMod· ·

        Replying to @kireitonsi

        Ha, fair push, but this one stays A file doesn't need an extension: Makefile, Dockerfile, LICENSE, and plenty of Linux scripts and binaries have none A real stack trace can point at any of them, so the hunt reads "file" as any file name, dot or not You're one small tweak away from par
    • MrDebuggerMod·